[Talk-us] Relation roles

[Nathan Edgars II]

On 6/29/2011 5:03 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> FWIW, and you should absolutely not listen to me because I'm a long way away
> and it's up to you guys to sort yourselves out... but I'd create a separate
> relation for each direction (i.e. one northbound relation, one southbound
> relation) and not bother with roles at all. It's simpler conceptually,
> simpler for the newbie to edit, simpler to process. (If you wanted to, you
> could then have a super-relation for the two relations, though personally I
> wouldn't see the need.)

This is simpler for dual carriageways, but certainly not when the road 
is primarily single-carriageway.