[Talk-us] US Interstate exit junction exit_to tag
Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.Net
Mon Mar 28 17:28:41 BST 2011
At 2011-03-28 09:13, Mike N wrote:
>... A different way to ask the question is does it make sense to render
>the exit_to at any time? The most likely use of the information is by
>navigation utilities - where the actual map rendering will be much more
>sparse to limit information to only that which is needed for driving. And
>exit_to information might be displayed separately and/or spoken.
> The counterpoint to having exit_to being rendered is that most people
> are only interested in exit numbers when reading a visualized map. In
> congested areas, the rendered exit_to information is extremely
> overbearing and distracting compared to the surrounding roads. In such
> cases, the compact ref= and name= (for named exits) results in a much
> cleaner map.
In southern California, in my experience, people do not use exit numbers
when giving directions - they use what we would call the name of the exit,
which is usually the name of the street on which the offramp terminates*.
One reason is that exit numbering was an afterthought - in process since
the 80s I think - and is still not complete. Another is that, for people
that have traveled the area extensively, the name of the exit gives one a
far better mental picture of where an exit is than the postmile-related
*But not always, particularly along the I-10 in older/denser parts of LA
county, where the ramp often terminates on a parallel side street or
frontage road, and one turns right or left to reach the road perpendicular
to the freeway, for which the exit is named.
Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.net>
More information about the Talk-us