[Talk-us] US highway classification

[Anthony]

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Nathan Mills <nathan at nwacg.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 00:13:33 -0400, Anthony wrote:
>
>> convincing people that their
>> area of the country isn't allowed to have any trunks.
>
> Also, why is this any worse than not having a motorway?

Why is what worse than not having a motorway?

> I don't think the
> folks in Newton County Arkansas care a whit whether the main road through
> their very rural county is trunk or primary or secondary or even tertiary.

They do if they're looking at a map, and none of the roads are drawn,
because tertiaries aren't drawn at that zoom level.

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Mills <nathan at nwacg.net> wrote:
> US-441 between St. Cloud and Yeehaw Junction could easily be trunk by NE2's
> definition (and apparently yours, although you haven't really indicated how
> exactly it should be used)

Having now looked at it quickly on other maps, yes, I think it could.