[Talk-us] Announcement: Address Improvement project

[Mike N]

On 10/5/2011 8:46 AM, Carl Anderson wrote:
> For range data there is uncertainty how to increment addresses when an
> end is such as
>
> N82W15855 VALLEY VIEW DR,, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI, 53051-3709, USA
> 45-558 KAMEHAMEHA HWY STE B3,, KANEOHE, HI, 96744-1944, USA
> 46-026 A ALALOA ST,, KANEOHE, 96744-3824, USA, HI

  At some point, the work required to define a custom address range 
exceeds the work required to tag each address individually, particularly 
if it's only used once.  If there are one or two dozen custom address 
incrementing schemes in the US, does it make sense to define rule sets 
for each one?

   I haven't skimmed all of the referenced specifications, which may 
have a hint on incrementing rules that would work in all of the US.