[Talk-us] access=destination vs access=private

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Sat Sep 10 05:05:46 BST 2011


On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 00:02 -0400, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>
wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 23:25 -0400, Anthony wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:36 PM, PJ Houser
> >> <stephanie.jean.houser at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Do you think it makes more sense to tag the apartment complexes
as
> >> > access=destination or access=private?
> >>
> >> Shouldn't they generally be access=permissive?
> >
> > At least in the states I've been in, in general it seems to be in a
> > commercial setting, it would be.  In residential settings, these
ways
> > tend to be closed to everyone except visitors/clients of residents
> > (couriers, plumbers, pizza delivery, garbage removal, etc) that have
> > have been invited in, and trespassing charges can be pressed against
> > everyone else.
> 
> Without warning?  Where in the US can you be charged with trespass
> without any warning (no sign, no fence, no marked trees, no building,
> no verbal warning)?

It's pretty rare for those things not to exist, visibly on the aerial
imagery even (given the commonality of fences), and it not being signed
in urban areas is rare.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20110909/db9f0817/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list