[Talk-us] access=destination vs access=private

Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
Sun Sep 11 15:59:05 BST 2011


On 9/11/2011 7:53 AM, Anthony wrote:
> The "no thru traffic" sign is nonstandard and very jurisdiction
> specific.  In general there is no "letter of the law", as the law
> generally does not mention such signs.

You seem to be right (at least in Florida): 
http://myfloridalegal.com/ago.nsf/Opinions/B762787E37D4A3CD85256E620055999C

So the question is whether access=destination should be used where the 
sign exists but has no legal meaning.
(As opposed to 
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=orlando&hl=en&ll=28.394553,-81.549518&spn=0.0168,0.041199&t=m&z=16&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=28.394524,-81.549396&panoid=f638RcwkM8_a-3tntIJmRg&cbp=12,335.79,,1,3.19 
which is on private property and hence presumably enforceable.)



More information about the Talk-us mailing list