[Talk-us] Disney (was Re: access=destination vs access=private)

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Tue Sep 13 14:43:34 BST 2011

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> wrote:
> Waste/Submerged would be correct status in 1960 prior to Disney
> development, not current status. Sounds like that website is not current
> source for Reedy Creek documents.

By the way, the particular parcel of land being referred to *is*
undeveloped, except for the highway.

More information about the Talk-us mailing list