[Talk-us] Disney (was Re: access=destination vs access=private)

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Thu Sep 15 14:50:11 BST 2011

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>> We're trying to figure out whether this sign restricts the use of the
>> road, or if it's BS:
> It asserts their right to uninvite  someone who provokes them and then order
> them to leave, on pain of arrest for tresspass.

That's also not what the sign says.  But if it did, doesn't that mean

As far as the tags we have, the only one that really applies is
access=private, though access=customers is close.

The sign does not say you may use the road so long as you need it to
get to your destination (access=destination).  That would preclude
cast members as using it as a cut-through alternative to World Drive.
And it would permit its use by solicitors, non-customers trying to
avoid parking fees, and Michael Moore.  It doesn't say that you may
use the road long as you are not uninvited (access=permissive).  That
would allow all those same things as access=destination and more.  It
says "Walt Disney World Resort Guest, Cast, and Business Invitees
Only".  That's access=private, or (kinda sorta) access=customers.

More information about the Talk-us mailing list