[Talk-us] Disney (was Re: access=destination vs access=private)

[Anthony]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>>
>> We're trying to figure out whether this sign restricts the use of the
>> road, or if it's BS:
>
> It asserts their right to uninvite  someone who provokes them and then order
> them to leave, on pain of arrest for tresspass.

That's also not what the sign says.  But if it did, doesn't that mean
access=permissive?

As far as the tags we have, the only one that really applies is
access=private, though access=customers is close.

The sign does not say you may use the road so long as you need it to
get to your destination (access=destination).  That would preclude
cast members as using it as a cut-through alternative to World Drive.
And it would permit its use by solicitors, non-customers trying to
avoid parking fees, and Michael Moore.  It doesn't say that you may
use the road long as you are not uninvited (access=permissive).  That
would allow all those same things as access=destination and more.  It
says "Walt Disney World Resort Guest, Cast, and Business Invitees
Only".  That's access=private, or (kinda sorta) access=customers.