[Talk-us] Update on remapping

Sun Apr 1 23:11:19 BST 2012

I am a newbie, wonder why the current license change downtime is affecting 
data. Does the new license make some existing data illegel and hence they 
are removing it? Or are they making use of the downtime to do additional QC 
edits/deletions?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <talk-us-request at openstreetmap.org>
To: <talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 6:42 AM
Subject: Talk-us Digest, Vol 53, Issue 2

> Send Talk-us mailing list submissions to
> talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> talk-us-request at openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> talk-us-owner at openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Talk-us digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Update on remapping (James Mast)
>   2. Re: Update on remapping (the Old Topo Depot)
>   3. Re: Update on remapping (Mike N)
>   4. Re: Update on remapping (James Mast)
>   5. Re: Update on remapping (the Old Topo Depot)
>   6. Re: Update on remapping (Mike N)
>   7. Re: Update on remapping (James Mast)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:50:03 -0400
> From: James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com>
> To: <talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
> Message-ID: <SNT141-W1210CD469D4357DA0C2AFDBF4F0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>> On 4/1/2012 6:54 AM, Mike N wrote:
>> I also felt it was important to keep adding new stuff
>> instead of 100% on cleanup.
>>  I did add new stuff as well.  Mostly it was brand new sub-divisions that 
>> were built after the original 2007 TIGER import that I spotted when 
>> cleaning up other data. -- James
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20120401/685da89a/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:51:55 -0400
> From: the Old Topo Depot <oldtopos at novacell.com>
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
> Message-ID:
> <CAEDOfzhSC1s8PRgRaepCfxM7VCPz16A_Rv142oigF3PYj4Jp=g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I cleaned up most of I95, I20 and I26 in SC, but did not have time for I77
> or any of the other road classes, so SC will need a lot more work.
>
> If I77 and SC 277 can be fixed (and I'm seeing what I think are a few
> bridge segments I missed on I26, darn it) at least the major roads should
> route.
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Mike N <niceman at att.net> wrote:
>
>> On 4/1/2012 4:42 AM, James Mast wrote:
>>
>>> So, who else here was at least somewhat successful in their objective in
>>> data cleanup (I still think this whole thing was kinda stupid, as I'd
>>> rather been fixing/adding new stuff instead of redoing stuff that others
>>> added)?
>>>
>>
>> I was somewhat successful in the sense that for the little time I could
>> spend on it, I was able to clean up a small circular region around me. In
>> some cases, I didn't bother to touch all nodes for an Interstate; there
>> will be some zany geometry when they are deleted, and I'll just recreate 
>> at
>> that time.  In addition, some intersecting nodes are still on the 
>> chopping
>> block, and they'll have to be detected by Mapdust or Keepright.    I also
>> felt it was important to keep adding new stuff instead of 100% on 
>> cleanup.
>>
>>  Columbia, SC however will be unusable for navigation for some time to
>> come.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-us<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> John Novak
> Novacell Technologies and the Old Topo Depot
> http://www.novacell.com
> 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20120401/f63586c9/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 07:55:17 -0400
> From: Mike N <niceman at att.net>
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
> Message-ID: <4F784225.7000000 at att.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 4/1/2012 7:51 AM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
>> I cleaned up most of I95, I20 and I26 in SC,
>
> I saw those come through - thanks for fixing them!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:07:24 -0400
> From: James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com>
> To: <talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
> Message-ID: <SNT141-W2404B2801C2C30E5936F2FBF4F0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I just noticed that 99% of I-81 is going to be nuked in Tennessee just now 
> because of the change.  Guess I found my project for the next few days 
> till the database is live again!  Thank goodness that you can edit offline 
> in JOSM. Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the 
> database is live so it can be one of the first uploads.  So, just wanted 
> to alert you guys to my plan here so nobody else does the same thing as me 
> so nobody else wastes their time on it. -- James
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20120401/a7b7ad67/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:16:10 -0400
> From: the Old Topo Depot <oldtopos at novacell.com>
> To: James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com>
> Cc: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
> Message-ID:
> <CAEDOfzgsqFX+ft_=ZSQ-vT=SAxiNK6mg+rArW=ReKEeaFaoUtg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Perhaps a wiki page could be used to coordinate this work.  There's
> certainly plenty of interstate work to go around ;-)
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:07 AM, James Mast 
> <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>>  I just noticed that 99% of I-81 is going to be nuked in Tennessee just
>> now because of the change.  Guess I found my project for the next few 
>> days
>> till the database is live again!  Thank goodness that you can edit 
>> offline
>> in JOSM.
>>
>> Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the database is
>> live so it can be one of the first uploads.  So, just wanted to alert you
>> guys to my plan here so nobody else does the same thing as me so nobody
>> else wastes their time on it.
>>
>> -- James
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> John Novak
> Novacell Technologies and the Old Topo Depot
> http://www.novacell.com
> 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20120401/75997601/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:24:44 -0400
> From: Mike N <niceman at att.net>
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
> Message-ID: <4F78490C.5050507 at att.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 4/1/2012 8:07 AM, James Mast wrote:
>> Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the database is
>> live so it can be one of the first uploads.
>
> And a small caution - if the ODBL removal bot happens to hit it before
> your upload, there will be version conflicts.   I have no idea on its
> timing however.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:42:27 -0400
> From: James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com>
> To: <talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
> Message-ID: <SNT141-W259A68197064C8A64C20B6BF4F0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Don't worry Mike.  I have to nuke I-81 myself as it's almost all created 
> by Lar's from the ways to the nodes.  This would be a wholesale cleanhouse 
> with everything I upload as V1's except for maybe a few ramps that aren't 
> tainted that bad to begin with.  So, I wouldn't have to worry about the 
> ODBL bot. And I just wish the the OSM database wasn't getting a 500 error 
> when trying to download via the Slippy map right now.  Uggh.  I was able 
> to download the I-81 TN relation directly, just can't use the Slippy map. 
> Too bad the Overpass API can't also download the Super Relations when you 
> download an area. -- James
> > Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:24:44 -0400
>> From: niceman at att.net
>> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
>>
>> On 4/1/2012 8:07 AM, James Mast wrote:
>> > Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the database is
>> > live so it can be one of the first uploads.
>>
>> And a small caution - if the ODBL removal bot happens to hit it before
>> your upload, there will be version conflicts.   I have no idea on its
>> timing however.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20120401/7694bfa6/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
> End of Talk-us Digest, Vol 53, Issue 2
> ************************************** 