[Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.

[Nathan Edgars II]

On 4/16/2012 8:56 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
> So, we're basically duplicating the existing way and then "blessing" it.
> Is this really sufficient - to verify the "tainted" geometry instead of
> re-drawing it?
Only if the nodes are clean.

> Another point, at least in SoCal, is that many of our "tainted" ways are
> created by "blars", who has not accepted the CT. However, these are
> TIGER-imported ways. They carry the TIGER tags. I'm sure they could be
> verified as having come from the TIGER import. They were no-doubt the
> result of having split an existing TIGER way. In this case, why is it
> not sufficient to see the TIGER tags on the way to consider it "blessed"
> along with all the other TIGER ways? Especially when tagged afterwards
> by accepting mappers with sources as above?
Because the OSMF is lazy and wants us to do the work in identifying 
false positives :)