[Talk-us] Naming of route relations

[Nathan Edgars II]

On 4/19/2012 10:04 AM, Alexander Jones wrote:
> The issues of the network=* tag notwithstanding, what should the route
> relations be named?
>
> For example, for, say, Texas State Highway 20 near El Paso, should the name
> tag say:
>
> "Texas State Highway 20"
> "TX 20"
> None (defaults to ref=20)
> Something else?
>
> Hopefully we can at least get consensus on this...

If JOSM was able to put the network in front of the ref in the relation 
list there wouldn't be a problem here.