[Talk-us] Redaction affected ways map

the Old Topo Depot oldtopos at novacell.com
Sat Aug 4 17:06:08 BST 2012


I suppose that this line (64)

http://127.0.0.1:8111/load_object?new_layer=true&objects=w" + osmid
is forcing the new layer ?

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, the Old Topo Depot <oldtopos at novacell.com>wrote:

> Hi Martijn,
>
> I believe you are not showing ways deleted by redaction; any way to add
> indicators for this situation to your display ?
>
> See
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.45269&lon=-122.29221&zoom=15&layers=M,
> for example.
>
> The additional road class information, as well as the specificity of the
> map, is quite important to help folks focus; could the OSMI view be
> enhanced to include highway=motorway/primary/secondary/tertiary/all else
> filters ?
>
> Also, every time I click a link on http://lima.schaaltreinen.nl/redactionI'm getting a new JOSM layer, which is suboptimal, IMHO.  Perhaps this
> could behave as OSMI JOSM links do ?
>
> Best
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04.08.2012 12:05, Stellan Lagerström wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice. What do the colors signify?
>>>> And I would suggest adding "Show in OSM" and/or "Edit in Potlatch/JOSM"
>>>> links.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There's also my version of this:
>>>
>>> http://tools.geofabrik.de/**osmi/?view=redactionbot&lon=-**
>>> 118.13960&lat=33.96068&zoom=10<http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=redactionbot&lon=-118.13960&lat=33.96068&zoom=10>
>>>
>>> In contrast to Martijn's map, this one isn't at all pretty ;) and my map
>>> doesn't differentiate roads from other stuff (or motorways from primary
>>> roads etc.) - the OSMI view simply shows a red mark wherever something was
>>> deleted by the bot; an orange mark wherever something was last edited by
>>> the bot; and a yellow mark where something was edited by the bot but
>>> someone else touched it later. It can show the (former) tags of deleted
>>> objects if you click on them (but don't you copy that into OSM...) and it
>>> has a "trash can" button that allows you to make a red thing go away (for
>>> cases where you say: well, that has been remapped already, or: this is
>>> really such a marginal feature that we don't need a mapper to go there and
>>> survey it again). Red things trashed this way become green. Update
>>> frequency is a couple times a day.
>>>
>>>
>> The OSMI visualization is much more comprehensive and I would recommend
>> it to anyone interested in doing systematic remapping. What I will do is
>> add a link to the Inspektor for the same extent.
>> What my map adds to the Inspektor view is a focus on the main road
>> system. Also, it is very easy to add a new query to the visualization. It
>> is currently updated every hour.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> --
>> martijn van exel
>> http://oegeo.wordpress.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> John Novak
> 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
>
>


-- 
John Novak
585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20120804/f9b0d977/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list