[Talk-us] Getting ready for the license change

[Andrew Cleveland]

On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:18 +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 13 January 2012 22:50, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> >
> >> I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner
> >> changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a
> >> decliner that I have personally been in touch with about the license
> >> change and my best judgement is that his / her decision is final.
> >
> > Speaking of, has anyone talked to balrog-kun yet?  I know he was at
> > one point insanely prolific and I often stumble across his data, he's
> > currently a decliner.
> 
> I'm balrog-kun, if you see my data in the US you can add odbl=clean*
> because I haven't used any non-ODbL sources outside of Europe.  But I
> have used such sources in Europe and so (Richard Weait says..) this is
> not compatible with CT 1.2.4.  This is not the main reason I have
> declined CT, but in any case all of my own work is ODbL compatible and
> me saying that probably has more legal value than a half-automatic
> click-through.. well, unless I'm not balrog-kun, but then I couldn't
> have put it on the user page.
> 
> I'm not in Oregon these days which is why no new data is appearing from me.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> * provided other authors in the history also license their
> contributions ODbL, which old LWG minutes say is *not* implied by CT
> acceptance.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

So every TIGER way in the western US will require the odbl=clean tag?