[Talk-us] tagging cul-de-sacs
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursamundi.org
Tue May 15 19:21:20 BST 2012
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> At 2012-04-10 07:29, Mike N wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/10/2012 10:17 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A roundabout (or mini_roundabout) implies to me (although it is not
>>>> defined on the wiki) that there is more than one entry / exit road. So
>>>> intuitively I'd say that is not an appropriate tag.
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree, this is not a roundabout. I use turning_circle, unless there
>>> is an island in the middle, in which case I draw the circular way as used in
>>> this example.
>>
>>
>> +1, unless I have a limited amount of time and a bunch of them with
>> islands in a tract, and then I tag them as turning_circle, too. I don't
>> think there's much difference here - it's about degrees of accuracy.
>>
> I tag culs-de-sac as turning_circles and only draw a circular way when there
> is an island in the middle. But I have a question. Where should the
> turning_circle node be placed? In the middle of the culs-de-sac or where
> the street enters the culs-de-sac?
I leave it off and tag it one-way in the legal direction of travel
around the loop (counterclockwise).
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list