[Talk-us] mapping job - unconnected _link roads

[Martijn van Exel]

Thanks for looking at this. Yes, the disused=yes would probably catch
a few, if and when I do another run on more recent data I will take it
into account.
The other ones would likely have been fixed since, I actually looked
at a few of them in WA earlier tonight.
Martijn

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>
>> One thing I do not understand is why the script catches the false
>> positive node 560176247 [1] (just an example, there are more like this
>> one).
>> Anyone with some SQL savvy care to look into that?
>>
> I looked at those in Western Washington but only one required fixing.  Some
> of the false positives were freeway links that are shown as disused=yes.
> They were on freeways that abruptly ended.   Adding in sql code to omit
> disused=yes would catch some.  Most of the other false positives were at
> connections between motorway links and the main freeway.   Not sure I
> understand why.  I couldn't see a pattern for those.  Only one possibility
> comes to mind - the nodes were connected after you grabbed the data.
>
> Clifford



-- 
martijn van exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com