[Talk-us] Difficult USA mapper(s)
dale.puch at gmail.com
Wed Oct 31 15:47:43 GMT 2012
My best take on the questions:
For this discussion your basically arbitrators. Investigate what is
involved with arbitration, what do they require and how do they manage
1) When is "being difficult" transitioning into an edit war that DWG has
dealt with? Is this just an edit war where one person is trying to resolve
it with discussion instead of continual reverts and edits?
2) The DWG needs a set of guidelines for it and the mappers that is
controlled by DWG (not a general use WIKI anyone can edit) that they can
point to for self resolution, or use if the DWG must take action on it's
3) It will happen because you will not have all the facts all the time.
Handle those situations gracefully.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Thank you for this well thought out email and summary of the DWG.
>> You've touched on an important issue, which is that the complains here
>> are a bit outside the scope of normal DWG functions, and more toward
>> conflict resolution and code of conduct.
>> This is not a role that's unfamiliar to the DWG- for example its
>> intervention in Israel.
>> You may be right that this code of conduct issue isn't the DWG's
>> domain, but no other organization has the ability/authority to take
>> such action.
> We need to stop talking in nebulous terms. "the complaints here" are
> apparently unknown to everyone. If it's not appropriate to describe the
> specific issues, then perhaps we shouldn't be having this conversation on
> the mailing list.
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us