[Talk-us] An admin_level for CDPs?
Minh Nguyen
mxn at 1ec5.org
Wed Jan 2 01:05:46 GMT 2013
On 2013-01-01 4:29 PM, dies38061 at mypacks.net
wrote:
> {{key|border_type}} is described as an alternative and sometimes complement to {{key|admin_level}} . I have recently been drawing subdivision boundaries based on County GIS data and including {{tag|border_type|subdivision}} as part of a relation of type border; see for instance http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2672911 . --ceyockey
I've also been using border_type as a way of distinguishing between
cities and villages, which have the same admin_level in my state.
However, I've been content with mapping suburban subdivisions as landuse
areas rather than boundary relations. It's a lot easier for other
mappers to work with.
The benefit of admin_level is that renderers know what to do with them
right out of the box, whereas every country has different border_type
values with different levels of significance.
--
Minh Nguyen <mxn at 1ec5.org>
Jabber: mxn at 1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list