[Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

James Mast rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 14 00:24:40 UTC 2013

That looks legit enough to qualify IMO for the "US:I:Future" network.  Looks like some of the I-74 signs that are posted out there in NC [0].  Still., those signs need to be posted along a segment to qualify for the network.  If the signs are the "Future Interstate Corridor" type [1], then that segment would NOT qualify for the "US:I:Future" network as it means there is a slim possibility that alignment might be bypassed.  That's happened with several "Future I-74 Corridor" alignments.
[0] - http://goo.gl/maps/mMIHW
[1] - http://www.texasfreeway.com/houston/photos/59sw/59sw.shtml (need to scroll down some)
> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:23:52 -0400
> From: kkenny2 at nycap.rr.com
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
> On 07/11/2013 01:57 PM, James Mast wrote:
> > Is there picture proof of how they are signing it?
> Would http://www.upstatenyroads.com/submit/region-8/Reg8-2.JPG
> do? That's in Monroe, New York (and not my picture).
> If my word is no good, will my camera be any better?
> I plan to be down that way in another week or so, and
> I could probably grab another picture. I can certainly
> state that I've seen the sign pictured there.
> -- 
> 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130713/de33286e/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list