[Talk-us] Removing US Bicycle Route tags

[Paul Johnson]

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com> wrote:

> The current discussion is about tagging a proposed bike route with a
> number in USBR namespace, when the USBR naming authority has not put
> that router/number into proposed status.
>

Then the relevant bodies need to stop bandying about those numbers as if
they're actually proposed.  As far as I can tell, nobody's using any
numbers that haven't been tossed around elsewhere yet, even if it's just a
"we propose some day this route will extend this far" capacity as is the
case with USBR 20 outside of Michigan, USBR 97 outside Alaska, etc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130605/6b81cfeb/attachment.html>