[Talk-us] Removing US Bicycle Route tags

[Paul Johnson]

I see the route numbers as potentially valuable to differentiate routes
where two may cross or duplex.  Unless I'm missing something fundamental,
pretty much every aspect in a state=proposed relation isn't final until
it's official, including the route number.  Especially since as far as I'm
aware, only USBR 76 and possibly USBR 1 has a name.


On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Mike N <niceman at att.net> wrote:

> On 6/8/2013 4:18 PM, KerryIrons wrote:
>
>> Here’re just some of the comments from OSM members:
>>
>
>  I'll add my opinion that I don't see the need for route numbers to be
> assigned to proposed routes.  Dashed lines suffice for the purposes of
> previewing a possible path.
>
>   (In which case, like everything else of this sort: admin boundaries,
> etc, proposed cycle routes could just be stored and rendered outside of the
> OSM database on an OpenProposedCycleMap.org rendering.)
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-us<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130608/2731df86/attachment.html>