[Talk-us] Tagging camp sites within campground

Jason Remillard remillard.jason at gmail.com
Fri Jun 14 01:08:27 UTC 2013


Hi

Some guesses :-)

1. node, ref=xxx
2. node, addr:housenumber
3. node, place=locality, name=xxx
4. node, tourism=camp_site, name=xxx

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=tourism&value=camp_site#combinations

Try using turbo overpass (http://overpass-turbo.eu/) , and look for
campsites over large areas (perhaps in Europe), and see what people
are doing. Let us know what you find!

Jason

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Tod Fitch <Tod at fitchdesign.com> wrote:
> re: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.81433&lon=-119.1004&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> Back in November of 2010 AM909 mapped much of the McGill
> campground using amenity=parking and ref=SiteNumber to show
> individual campsites. See, for example
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/988132518/history
>
> This seems wrong to me. About like mapping each driveway
> in a subdivision with a parking icon. However I have not
> found a better solution on the wiki nor by searching taginfo.
> The closest I've come is this discussion on the talk-ca
> archives:
>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2010-August/003211.html
>
> with an example at
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5500386
>
> I like the idea of using addr:housenumber=SiteNumber but the
> use of addr:city=CampgroundName as well as
> addr:street=CampgroundName seems suspect to me. I think this
> was done so that the location could be searched for using
> geographic queries, but isn't that a bit like "tagging for
> the renderer"?
>
> What would be the best practice for this in the US?
>
> Thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



More information about the Talk-us mailing list