[Talk-us] [Tagging] Removing US Bicycle Route tags
Greg Troxel
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Sat Jun 15 12:01:53 UTC 2013
Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> writes:
> Again, I'm still not hearing a suggestion that would keep this valuable
> information in OSM, or a compelling reason not to keep it.
It's not clear that it's valuable. If you want to propose a scheme for
desired corridors by only-slightly-authoritative organizations, feel
free. The compelling reason is that there is information in the
database which is incorrect. That's always a good reason to simply
outright remove it.
> We do map proposed routes, we don't map for the renderer. It still
> sounds like the core issue is some proposals are mapped more
> specifically than they are on paper.
The present issue is that there is are specific routes in the db as
proposed when there is no actual proposal, but instead merely a desired
corridor by a only-slightly-authoritative organization.
> I don't think this is an insurmountable problem to fix within the
> boundaries of not tagging for the renderer.
It's straightfoward: delete the bogus data.
> With that in mind, I would love to hear ideas how to tackle the
> proposed corridor issue so that they may be more properly mapped, not
> outright excluded over cyclemap rendering issues.
It's not about cyclemap rendering issues. The problem is that the
database has incorrect information. If someone added polygons that
said "aca_desired_corridor", and that was checkable because they
published that desire, I don't think there'd be any issues, other than
the larger issue of "X wants Y - so what? Who is X and why does anybody
care?"
It sounds like you are conflating "how to (and whether) should we
represent desired corridor by only-slightly-authoritative organizations"
and "fixing the database by removing items that are incorrect". It's
not reasonable to ask anyone to refrain from fixing the database without
solving some other problem.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130615/6c1e499e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list