[Talk-us] ref tags

[Toby Murray]

Yes, the relations are all tagged correctly with network=US:KS. As for the
ref on the ways, anything I've touched is KS. There was another user who
did a bunch as K-xx for a while but I think I convinced him that we should
go with KS and put K-xx in a loc_ref tag or something like that.

Toby


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

> Curious if you guys are using US:KS for the network, which would fit the
> pattern or not?  I ask because on the way's ref tags, some people are
> correctly using KS, but others are just using K.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Toby Murray <toby.murray at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, I'm guessing interstates and US routes are mostly done. The things
>> that might be missing is bannered routes (truck, business, etc). I suspect
>> that state highways are going to be a patchwork. I'm pretty sure I've got
>> most of the major and a good number of minor Kansas highways done. This
>> wiki page should fairly accurately reflect reality:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kansas_state_highways
>>
>> Toby
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>
>>> A related question - do we have a clear idea of route relation
>>> completeness in the US? Looking at
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highways_Relations
>>>
>>> This look pretty well organized, but I know how wikis can be deceiving
>>> like that.
>>> Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for some
>>> states, there are no State Route relation pages. (
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations#See_also
>>> )
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great. I am just catching up on SOTM US talks and watching yours.
>>>> Enjoying it a lot!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Phil! Gold <phil_g at pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> * Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> [2013-06-18 10:40 -0600]:
>>>>> > Perhaps we can get together on IRC sometime soon and see what would
>>>>> need to
>>>>> > be done. I can't make tonight but tomorrow early evening (like, 6PM
>>>>> MDT)
>>>>> > would work. Ian, Phil, Toby, are you around then?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's 8pm for me, which might work.  Depending on other stuff I have
>>>>> going on that evening, I might not be available until 8:30 or so (EDT).
>>>>> (Wednesday's my only free evening this week, so if it doesn't work I
>>>>> won't
>>>>> be available until Saturday sometime.)
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>>>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Martijn van Exel
>>>> http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
>>>> http://openstreetmap.us/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martijn van Exel
>>> http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
>>> http://openstreetmap.us/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130619/378c0978/attachment.html>