[Talk-us] ref tags

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Wed Jun 19 19:52:49 UTC 2013


Curious if the network for RM and FM is consistently US:TX:FM for both,
since they're both part of the same network.
On Jun 19, 2013 10:52 AM, "Clay Smalley" <claysmalley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Fortunately most of Texas has been done, but unfortunately the FM/RM roads
> haven't been completed and there are quite a lot of them. I made a Mapcraft
> to help add relations to them all: http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/269
>
> I've made a little progress in the Texas Panhandle but we definitely need
> more people to help out if it's gonna get done.
> On Jun 19, 2013 7:39 AM, "Paul Johnson" <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for some
>>> states, there are no State Route relation pages. (
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations#See_also
>>> )
>>>
>>
>> I'm working on Oklahoma right now and keeping it documented.  Progress
>> has been slow since I'm not satisfied in just slapping down relations, I'm
>> checking each highway for continuity and connectivity as I go along.  I've
>> been going somewhat sequentially but if I come across a state highway I
>> know goes through but things refuse to route down it while I'm working,
>> I'll go through and fine-tooth-comb it when I get back (as I'm doing with
>> OK 48 right now).
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130619/db5598ed/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list