[Talk-us] Updating unchanged TIGER imports to TIGER 2013
enf at pobox.com
Wed Mar 13 01:36:13 UTC 2013
That sounds like a good idea to me. I want to be careful not to break
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>wrote:
> On 3/12/13 9:32 PM, Eric Fischer wrote:
>> Thanks for the helpful comments. At least anecdotally, I think I have
>> actually seen the TIGER merge lead to more anomalies in gridded areas than
>> in hills, maybe because people feel more comfortable making minor edits to
>> mostly-regular grids.
>> I completely agree that any new ways imported from TIGER will have to be
>> reviewed manually, if for no other reason because they generally don't
>> connect to any existing node.
>> I am intending to produce the additions and adjustments as separate .osc
>> files that can be examined for correctness in JOSM before being applied.
>> Would people generally be comfortable with accepting node relocations that
>> don't cause any ways to overlap themselves without extensive manual
>> and only carefully reviewing additions?
>> i think the best approach is to manually review early ones to develop
> comfort level with the non-overlapping case.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us