[Talk-us] NHD tags

[Paul Norman]

I delete all of those but gnis:feature_id and source when I'm editing if
I'm confident that the OSM tags are right.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Remillard [mailto:remillard.jason at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 5:57 PM
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD tags
> 
> Anybody care about NHD tags????
> 
> The geometry is very rough on the import. I guess it's OK to delete the
> NHD tags while fixing up the geometry?
> 
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jason Remillard
> <remillard.jason at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I came across my first NHD imported data set this weekend, in Western
> MA.
> >
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43638395
> >
> > It has the following tags.
> >
> > NHD:ComID = 7711652
> > NHD:FCode = 39004
> > NHD:FDate = 1999/09/06
> > NHD:FTYPE = LakePond
> > NHD:GNIS_ID = 00212194
> > NHD:GNIS_Name = Lake Winnemaug
> > NHD:RESOLUTION = Medium
> > NHD:ReachCode = 01100005003135
> > gnis:feature_id = 00212194
> > name = Lake Winnemaug
> > natural = water
> > source = NHD
> >
> > The NHD wiki is pretty confusing. Is there is any kind of consensus on
> > how NHD data *should* look inside OSM?  Should any of these NHD tags
> > even be maintained inside OSM?
> >
> > Also, the GNIS id is prefixed with 2 extra zero's. Is that OK, or
> > ideally would that be fixed too?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jason.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us