[Talk-us] Fwd: Question about incorrect data for an administrative area

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Wed Oct 16 00:16:04 UTC 2013


On 10/15/13 8:01 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote:
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Las_Vegas>
>
> Defining an alt_name or loc_name of "Las Vegas" on each of the
> surrounding CDP boundaries/relations may help Nominatim geocode these
> cases better.  But the CDPs are not part of the city (aside from any
> areas that may have been annexed, which should be reflected in the new
> TIGER 2013 boundaries) and should not be conflated with the city boundary.
right. whatever gets done with boundaries should be done on something
that at least tries to reflect facts, and not based on notions. that's why
i suggested going to TIGER 2013 as, while it may not perfectly reflect
the exact legal boundaries, it should be pretty close, as the Census
Bureau does actually care about getting the headcounts right.

richard



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131015/ad43eb81/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 946 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131015/ad43eb81/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list