[Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 29 07:33:29 UTC 2014
So, nobody else has a comment on how the repair work should be done?
Last chance before I respond back to the DWG e-mail (and as of right now, will be recommending just the reverting of only the 'highway=xxx' upgrades). Just want to make sure the masses don't have a problem with this.
From: rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:01:19 -0500
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
Nobody else has a comment on what should be done here?
If you don't remember the start of this discussion of this subject, here's the link to the original post I made on this subject to the list so you can see it:
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:24:50 -0500
> From: niceman at att.net
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
> On 1/16/2014 12:16 AM, James Mast wrote:
> > Anyways guys, post what you think should be done here so I can get back
> > to the DWG on this subject. (I'm personally all for the reverting of
> > the highway=xxx upgrades this user has done only and not a full scale
> > revert of all his changesets as he did do some highway cleanup in some
> > changesets while doing the 'highway=xxx' upgrades.)
> I would be for the revert of the highway=xxx changes. While the Wiki
> has no hard and fast rule on the 'right way' to tag these, clearly some
> information has been lost by eliminating a highway type.
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us