[Talk-us] Named beaches, too?

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Sat May 24 14:45:19 UTC 2014

It has been pointed out in numerous places before, but just in case you
missed it: there is an ongoing effort (since months) to remove all
"catch alls" from the standard style.

This implies that stuff you thought was rendered might vanish, but in
fact it was just accidental that it was shown in the first place. If
there is a feature that you feel strongly should be displayed with the
standard style, then you should submit a feature request.


Am 24.05.2014 05:56, schrieb stevea:
> As long as I'm whinging about mapnik getting "different" (simpler, with
> omissions) it seems named beaches are not rendering, either.
> Whinge, whine.  Why bother?  Oh, yeah:  the tagging captures.  Yet
> without "definitive" (Standard) rendering, why bother?  (Can't say when
> named beaches "ducked out," but NR/leisure=nature_reserve was recent).
> Wow, I'm in a mood:  don't mess with (our) mapnik?!  Again, I'm all for
> improvements.  But dumbing down?
> Can't we just talk?
> SteveA
> California
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20140524/178117ea/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list