[Talk-us] For comment: import of amenity=bicycle_repair_stations

[Peter Dobratz]

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Greg Morgan <dr.kludge.gm at gmail.com> wrote:

> ...
>


> In a note tag I added a reference to your import page.  That would be
> useful for other mappers to know why and how.
>

Seems like this note would be better suited for the changeset comment
instead of the OSM Object.


>
> I added service:bicycle:charging=no based on the main page.  There's a
> few electric bicycle shops around downtown.
>
> I added a website tag and pointed to the Dero fix it map.
>

I think it's better to make the simplest URL possible here.  For this case,
use "http://www.dero.com/" instead of "
http://www.dero.com/fixitmap/fixitmap.html"
Web developers change their mind about how they want their sites laid out
all the time.  Usually the domain name remains the same.

I added source_alt = survey.  I am guessing that source=osmsync:dero
> is part of you conflation process.  If so, then you might want to make
> that clear on you import page
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Dero_Bike_Repair


Information about the source of data makes a lot more sense as a source tag
on the changeset instead of the OSM Object.

I dutifully added ref=<none> but did not understand the point.  Will
> this be part of the conflation magic?  If so, then you might want to
> make that clear on you import page.
>

I don't think there is any precedence for using the actual value "<none>"
for a ref tag (or any other tag).  If you are trying to indicate that there
is no reference number associated with these, then just omit the ref tag.

--Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150209/3717bba3/attachment.html>