[Talk-us] Question?

Hans De Kryger hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 4 09:40:24 UTC 2015


Sorry for the late response, great idea Clifford. I will contact the editor
first. But my opinion is it does not meet the requirements and therefor
should be removed from osm. If it should be moved to OHM is another
discussion.

*Regards,*

*Hans*


*http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13>*

*Sorry for any misspellings*

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sorry about that, should of been more specific. I meant the archeological
> site.
> On Jun 29, 2015 2:24 PM, "Clifford Snow" <clifford at snowandsnow.us> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for pointing out the wiki page on archaeological sites. I wasn't
>> aware it was documented.
>>
>>
>> --
>> @osm_seattle
>> osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
>> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150704/ae9b698f/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list