[Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

Phil! Gold phil_g at pobox.com
Tue Jun 23 14:30:10 UTC 2015

* Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com> [2015-06-22 08:32 -0400]:
> On June 22, 2015 2:46:36 AM EDT, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com> wrote:
> >>         tiger:reviewed=no
> >
> >Most of the well reviewed Tiger I see still has this tag.
> >People don't know to delete it.
> Usually I change it to =yes instead of just deleting it. The main reason
> is I frequently use ITOworld maps to review the county I live in to find
> unreviewed roads, and I like the color pattern better that way.

Hm.  Maybe I'll start doing that.  I also use tiger:reviewed=position to
signify that I've armchair-mapped the way to align with aerial imagery but
haven't yet been out to verify the road name.  (Details about my use of
this tag are in this diary entry:



...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/
PGP: 026A27F2  print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248  9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2
--- --
        Anyone seen smoking will be assumed to be on fire and will
        be summarily put out.
---- --- --

More information about the Talk-us mailing list