[Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Your opinion about SOTM US

[Ian Dees]

As others have mentioned, this map might give false positives where TIGER
data is worse than OSM. It might be better to look at the map of OSM
intersecting TIGER 2007ish and use that to highlight areas where the
geometry hasn't changed since the original import. A roughly similar result
could be found by showing only the geometry from bots + DaveHansenTiger.
On Mar 14, 2015 9:59 PM, "Alex Barth" <alex at mapbox.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  The editor visits a site which accesses the JOSM remote
>>> control protocol. They fix up the TIGER date and indicate "Yes, I'm
>>> done" or "Needs more work", and after a couple of Yes votes, it gets
>>> taken out of rotation.
>>>
>> Sounds similar to the HOT OSM Tasking Manager?
>>
>
> Yeah, that's just setting up a HOT tasking manager right? Except the HOT
> tasking manager will probably choke on one half hour tasks for all of US :)
>
> Here's a map showing where TIGER is better than OSM:
>
> https://api.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/lxbarth.647bc246/page.html?access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoibHhiYXJ0aCIsImEiOiJFVXdYcUlvIn0.bbaHTEWlnAwGgyVwJngMdQ#5/39.724/-99.360
>
> It's using the same data you'll get if you use the "New & Misaligned TIGER
> Roads" layer in iD and JOSM, so all of the map above is actionable.
>
> At Mapbox we're working on focusing better our work better going after the
> higher order road networks first. Happy to share once we have results here.
> I don't have an ETA for this work yet.
>
> Also relevant: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Richard/diary/34290
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150315/139cb7b1/attachment.html>