[Talk-us] Extra wide shoulders / travel lanes in NJ

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Tue Oct 13 10:55:53 UTC 2015


On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Mike Dupont <jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com
> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> > A hard shoulder is not a bike lane and should not be tagged as such.
>
>
> If you look at the supporting document some sections are declared as
> bikable by the city planning. there are share the road signs in some
> areas. I am thinking about how to declare there, I do see people
> biking or walking on some.
>

I would tag as appropriate the cycleway=lane and lanes:bicycle=* as
appropriate if it's actually a lane, and shoulder=* for shoulders.  It's
possible to have both at the same time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20151013/f107392b/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list