[Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

[Richard Welty]

On 9/2/15 12:25 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I'm kind of seeing that as abuse of classification and classification
> creep as well.  I'd probably have gone with trunk for the entire
> length of KS 7 from KS 32 to KS 10 rather than spin the wheel and
> creep it upwards.  I'm not really seeing a significant difference in
> characteristic in the WA 500 example or the KS 7 example from the 70
> MPH sections of OK 33 or US 75 between Tulsa and Bartlesville, OK. 
> All four are surface freeways with regular intersections.  This one
> doesn't "go to 11", folks; if you think you need a mix of motorway and
> trunk, it's probably just a trunk.
>
it's a grey area, and i think anyone getting into an edit war over it
probably
needs to chill out a bit.

richard

-- 
rwelty at averillpark.net
 Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
 OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
 Java - Web Applications - Search


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150902/fbec57e5/attachment.sig>