[Talk-us] Another road classification disagreement (this time with HFCS in Kansas)

[Richard Fairhurst]

Greg Troxel wrote:
> It's perfectly reasonable to have an unpaved highway=secondary in 
> rural areas, if that's one of the major roads around.

...with the proviso that it _must_ be tagged as surface=unpaved (or a more
detailed tag, such as surface=gravel or surface=dirt). Standard tagging in
developed countries is that such roads are assumed paved unless otherwise
specified.

Richard




--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Another-road-classification-disagreement-this-time-with-HFCS-in-Kansas-tp5854071p5855178.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.