[Talk-us] Check your turn:lanes

[Paul Johnson]

Here's another example of how none breaks:
http://mapillary.com/map/im/IUibLmC-b_nkLkYjziO7pA

If you're only going by signs and pavement markings without context, this
would be none|none|none|none leading up to the intersection, instead of
left|through|through|merge_to_left


On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Paul, your examples are pretty much exactly what I've been doing, with the
> exception that for the last one I was using:
>
> turn:lanes=none|none|none;slight_right
>
> because of the aforementioned discussion of whether or not to use
> "through" without signage.
>
> --jack
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So I take it that at least you and I are in agreement that the wiki is
>>> deficient for branching exits like this one:
>>> http://mapillary.com/map/im/7igAGXSa6EsUYlTIujXchw
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that's correct.  Moving a couple frames closer to
>> http://mapillary.com/map/im/MsMAW3HKVNYxEVCtkRneBg, here's how I would
>> tag three segments based on what's visible there and no other context:
>>
>> Ahead of camera after diverging ramp:
>>
>> highway=motorway
>> oneway=yes
>> lanes=3
>> ref=I 75
>> hgv:lanes=no|yes|yes
>>
>> The ramp from the physical gore (next to the exit sign) to the tip of the
>> theoretical (painted) gore (with the node for the intersection being even
>> with the theoretical gore):
>>
>> highway=motorway_link
>> oneway=yes
>> placement=transition
>> lanes=1
>> destination=Sycamore;Ocilla
>> destination:ref=GA 32  (also, damn, had to check the minimap on that, I
>> almost said MO 32 based on the shape).
>> junction:ref=78
>>
>> Behind the camera:
>>
>> highway=motorway
>> oneway=yes
>> lanes=3
>> ref=I 75
>> hgv:lanes=no|yes|yes
>> turn:lanes=through|through|through;slight_right
>>
>> Your Osmand "invention" example is a perfect case-study of what I'm
>>> working on.  I'm trying to get exits on I 75 in Georgia and Florida tagged
>>> with destination and lane guidance so that Osmand can show proper guidance,
>>> and hopefully other OSM-based navigation apps will add that feature, too.
>>> As it stands, I use Osmand to test my tags.
>>>
>>
>> I've been testing this, as well.  I'm fortunate enough to live in a city
>> that has nearly every kind of interchange to play with (except for some of
>> the newer CFI styles, but OKC and...for like, no reason, rural interchanges
>> with basically no traffic on I 40 leading into the Ouachitas are getting
>> those) and well enough aware of the tagging in play to have seen what works
>> and what doesn't, now.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20160825/69097bee/attachment-0001.html>