[Talk-us] Best practices for dealing with old TIGER tags?

[Richard Fairhurst]

Madeline Steele wrote:
> What do you all think about this?

The sine qua non for me is that the absence of a tiger:reviewed= tag (or one
set to =yes) means that you can trust the value of the highway= tag.

This is especially true of rural areas where unreviewed highway=residential
covers a multitude of sins.

There is a special corner of hell/Steve's basement for people who remove
tiger:reviewed=no on rural unpaved roads without changing the highway tag or
adding a surface tag.

cheers
Richard




--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Best-practices-for-dealing-with-old-TIGER-tags-tp5874640p5874647.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.