[Talk-us] mapRe: (Second attempt) Potential data source: Adirondack Park Freshwater Wetlands
Richard Fairhurst
richard at systemed.net
Thu Mar 17 17:19:26 UTC 2016
Kevin Kenny wrote:
> In fact, I think the best approach might be to confine the
> initial import to the open water features (appropriately
> conflated with what is already in OSM), with the other
> wetland features being added later. Doing the open water
> in small sections and conflating as we go would give us
> confidence in the alignment.
That sounds great.
I'm far from the biggest fan of imports, but good-quality data for
unnavigable waters in comparatively remote regions is pretty much the poster
child for "ain't going to be surveyed", so I'd say go for it.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Second-attempt-Potential-data-source-Adirondack-Park-Freshwater-Wetlands-tp5868622p5870093.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list