[Talk-us] mapRe: (Second attempt) Potential data source: Adirondack Park Freshwater Wetlands

Richard Fairhurst richard at systemed.net
Thu Mar 17 17:19:26 UTC 2016


Kevin Kenny wrote:
> In fact, I think the best approach might be to confine the 
> initial import to the open water features (appropriately 
> conflated with what is already in OSM), with the other 
> wetland features being added later. Doing the open water 
> in small sections and conflating as we go would give us 
> confidence in the alignment.

That sounds great.

I'm far from the biggest fan of imports, but good-quality data for
unnavigable waters in comparatively remote regions is pretty much the poster
child for "ain't going to be surveyed", so I'd say go for it.

cheers
Richard



--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Second-attempt-Potential-data-source-Adirondack-Park-Freshwater-Wetlands-tp5868622p5870093.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the Talk-us mailing list