[Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

[Paul Norman]

On 3/24/2016 5:50 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> It is obvious to me that all occurrences of highway=social_path need to
> be replaced with whatever they were before. I'd normally say let's give
> them some time to come up with a better idea but seeing that the problem
> has been highlighted to them pretty much at the time they made the edits
> 5 months ago, and they haven't come up with a better idea, I'd say the
> time is up now.

After talking to some others involved and the talk-us@ discussion, it's 
reasonably clear that this is another of those cases where a path exists 
but the property owner or government doesn't allow access, and there's a 
well established way of tagging that: access=no, and I've tagged the 
paths accordingly.

If someone is unhappy with how access=no is rendered on a particular map 
or router, they should raise it on the issue tracker of that style or 
router profile. Complaints on a local list will not make it to the 
developers of most styles.