[Talk-us] Colorado mappers: Check your notes carefully

OSM Volunteer stevea steveaOSM at softworkers.com
Mon May 2 01:06:35 UTC 2016


I have been putting out the fire of a mild edit war in Colorado involving the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route, http://www.osm/org/relation/3161159 <http://www.osm/org/relation/3161159> where MountainAddict keeps setting this to network=ncn when clearly it is network=icn (as it crosses the Canadian border in Alberta).  A partial compromise/consensus solution has emerged:  keep a duplicate relation synced as route=mtb.  OK, that makes sense.

With others who “brush up against” the DWG (who remain nameless here), I think/thought we stabilized this.  However, as I did think this a month or two ago, then MountainAddict recently switched it back (so I had to as well).  Keeping an eye towards the activities of MountainAddict seems prudent.  I don’t think s/he is malicious, perhaps just misinformed or needing to have his/her understanding of tagging “enhanced” so it is more in-line with a larger consensus.

SteveA
California
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20160501/295c738c/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list