[Talk-us] Colorado mappers: Check your notes carefully
OSM Volunteer stevea
steveaOSM at softworkers.com
Mon May 2 01:06:35 UTC 2016
I have been putting out the fire of a mild edit war in Colorado involving the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route, http://www.osm/org/relation/3161159 <http://www.osm/org/relation/3161159> where MountainAddict keeps setting this to network=ncn when clearly it is network=icn (as it crosses the Canadian border in Alberta). A partial compromise/consensus solution has emerged: keep a duplicate relation synced as route=mtb. OK, that makes sense.
With others who “brush up against” the DWG (who remain nameless here), I think/thought we stabilized this. However, as I did think this a month or two ago, then MountainAddict recently switched it back (so I had to as well). Keeping an eye towards the activities of MountainAddict seems prudent. I don’t think s/he is malicious, perhaps just misinformed or needing to have his/her understanding of tagging “enhanced” so it is more in-line with a larger consensus.
SteveA
California
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20160501/295c738c/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list