[Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

[Richard Welty]

On 5/4/16 9:54 AM, Elliott Plack wrote:
> Thanks for all of the feedback. I definitely won't be merging any
> relations based on some of what you have all stated. What I will do is
> go through and look at each relation state by state to ensure there is
> connectivity and what not. I'll update anything of interest here. 
if i found myself looking at a relation which was on a border (as Kenny
pointed out)
i'd probably just give the relation a name like NC-TN. there's no reason
to make this
any harder than that.

richard

-- 
rwelty at averillpark.net
 Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
 OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
 Java - Web Applications - Search


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20160504/1d92939e/attachment.sig>