[Talk-us] Restoring bus routes in Portland
Bill Ricker
bill.n1vux at gmail.com
Fri May 20 12:50:01 UTC 2016
Please to specify which Portland on subject lines.
I can't tell if this is referring to something within driving distance or
not.
Contrary to local opinion in PDX, there are other Portlands.
Since posted to talk-us, i can discount Portland, Dorset. (The original
Port on an Island.)
But Portland ME (PWM) has buses and is in USA.
When speaking of Portland (or Springfield, etc), if one fails to specify
which, one communicates ones parochial bias, not ones intended meaning.
Folks in the several Springfields are well aware of this - only the
Simpsons fail to specify which Springfield unless for strictly local
consumption - but PDX seems to think being the #1 city in a pacific coast
state that isn't California but doesn't border Canada either makes it
obviously "the" Portland.
In this case, 'TriMet routes' buried in 2nd graph will confirm for someone
in the local region that it's their Portland ... but i don't know how
either Portland's transit has rebranded in recent decade, i'm still
wondering.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Arun Ganesh <arun.planemad at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Requesting for help from those experienced with managing relations. We
> have a group of changesets that caused a breakage in multiple route
> relations in Portland.
>
> The issue was reported today by Portland mapper Peter who has been mapping
> the TriMet routes on the Mapbox data team project tracker for adding turn
> lanes. The relation members of around 20 routes and some turn restrictions
> have been replaced by another route accidentally. After speaking to the
> mapper, the entire incident has been documented here [1].
>
> Currently it is unclear how to recreate such a scenario and if it was a
> mapper oversight or software issue that caused so many relations to change
> without being noticed. We still need to restore the routes to its previous
> state and the workflow/tools for this does not seem very clear.
>
> Reverting the changesets are causing multiple conflicts and there does not
> seem to be a mechanism to just restore relation membership to a historical
> version. Any help and ideas appreciated
>
> [1] https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/185
>
> --
> Arun Ganesh
> @planemad
> <http://j.mp/ArunGanesh>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
--
Bill Ricker
bill.n1vux at gmail.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20160520/b759106a/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list