[Talk-us] RRFB Tag

[Harald Kliems]

The wiki page seems to suggest that it should be flashing_lights=button
instead of having the separate button_operated tag. But I'm not sure if
that tagging actually makes more sense than the one you suggested.

 Harald.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:40 PM Spencer Gardner <spencergardner at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Perhaps I can answer my own question. I hadn't noticed the
> flashing_lights=yes suggestion in the wiki. So does a scheme like this make
> sense?:
> crossing=uncontrolled
> flashing_lights=yes
> button_operated=yes
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Spencer Gardner <spencergardner at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> Is there a conventional way to tag Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons
> <https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/conventional/unsignalized/tech_sum/fhwasa09009/>?
> These are effectively crosswalks with additional signage and user-activated
> flashing yellow lights. The crossing=traffic_signals tag seems more akin to
> a HAWK <https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/fhwasa14014/>
> signal (similar to European "Pelican") and doesn't really work for RRFBs
> since there's no real traffic control.
>
> Spencer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20170222/1be806cc/attachment-0001.html>