[Talk-us] Am I wrong to be bothered by this?
tod at fitchdesign.com
Thu Jan 5 20:26:47 UTC 2017
I monitor a number of places I’ve done mapping in and suspect I’ll be back to in the future. Today I noticed a change set that covers nearly all of California and Nevada . It looks like this same mapper has even done some changes that span continents .
I guess I prefer geographically compact change sets: It makes me feel that all the changes have actually been looked at. And, at least with how I use the OSM tools I know about, I can quickly take a look and see if I agree or not. In this case, I’ve found a few of the actual ways changed in my area of interest  and wonder why the street name was dropped from the way. I guess I need to dig through all the changed ways now and it would just be easier if the change set did not cover so large an area most of which I have no way of doing a site survey to verify.
Am I out of line to be annoyed when I see a change set like this one?
More information about the Talk-us