[Talk-us] Am I wrong to be bothered by this?

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Fri Jan 6 09:12:15 UTC 2017


On 01/05/2017 11:28 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> We have rules
> about automatic/mechanical edits that say that any edit where the person
> making the edit doesn't actually look at the concrete object they're
> editing needs to be discussed and approved in advance.

On re-reading this, the "approved" sounds a bit wrong: The plan must be
discussed and may only proceed if (ideally) there are no objections from
the community, or (not so ideal) the few objections are drowned in a sea
of support ;)


Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

More information about the Talk-us mailing list