[Talk-us] Fwd: Re: Blue Ridge Parkway

Charlotte Wolter techlady at techlady.com
Tue Jan 31 16:54:55 UTC 2017


         And feel free to correct it in Wikipedia.
         Also, one reason it is so highly visited 
is that it is a major highway.

Charlotte


>Authentication-Results: cdptpa-imsmta10 
>header.DKIM-Signature=@snowandsnow-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; 
>dkim=permfail (body hash did not verify)
>Delivered-To: techlady at techlady.com
>DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>  d=snowandsnow-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
>  h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
>  :cc; bh=yRCjtczqzVtZalYCj/IOl4HgLx9NtOqkGWs82VSdAX8=;
>  b=IvAT7hILEuXe8T+hS9YsFy7MdnNy4OoQKx1zaGc3BjTPasJkrDgW9XSbKN1Zqz7vk6
>  tkyumX3S20fhY8v8dx6Twckf5gYH3kRWo0WCQGOGd5NK9yRF7nR4IsIpieqVTiLKdU7R
>  9oGIHErzx5i/bqf5tPY5w5XURNEDg/eOLX/MnjDEcB4FlZbBfn3R3OEPzwfUTAztWK/m
>  IRzOtDT+ubJwmIALW4xE467BNNXaQuFUnB8rtqRBNgx+g2L63OjMCOmoLtWb0cUfs5JH
>  ZROE2faqEv2Br/Kb+4L5uF2bxBT+lPzMvXOP06kIieuf+pCHmegPZgO6YbCmtObfhJGf
>  ZI5Q==
>X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>  d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
>  h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
>  :message-id:subject:to:cc;
>  bh=yRCjtczqzVtZalYCj/IOl4HgLx9NtOqkGWs82VSdAX8=;
>  b=ABkLfvF2/ED9eh8KFb00/P3eaQ+7v/fXqaYm8urxnIE+T/3OUrylddktF+xFoLSsDJ
>  S2G5B/CU0hQWf10PghQq43iOGL7csjX4NFXuQuG+s7muz2iqJlWJCNAiaV2WtcTFqT1c
>  Qosvh4JqhqbCDZfIxERtnA1IFKAEOKKxBfu3lncXMrcsAU1F8/Q0SW6W7MMovhoQe+5e
>  3w87q9isPHzJBgPFaw3vn4Qrcu6En4nlnorgpeDJJTMf+QC4GopZdsNbEPxJMVcRNy7o
>  FNudhOsie5eIER2QW2i1oOob9Mc/YxminUXKsvAT29qfUUR9x2I4CFqtcauZKw8zqeme
>  +Y9A==
>X-Gm-Message-State: 
>AIkVDXKhnbXbIahkZTHL1F0I2RrgjIqJlIdO+algKR+f73jdlY/jncKXvfSKC+V/+/9M+POG3nG3/nWVYX8zfA==
>X-Received: by 10.176.4.38 with SMTP id 35mr10406498uav.15.1485813626658; Mon,
>  30 Jan 2017 14:00:26 -0800 (PST)
>From: Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us>
>Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:00:06 -0800
>To: Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
>Cc: "talk-us at openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap" <talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
>Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Blue Ridge Parkway
>X-BeenThere: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
>List-Id: OpenStreetMap USA <talk-us.openstreetmap.org>
>List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/options/talk-us>,
>  <mailto:talk-us-request at openstreetmap.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/>
>List-Post: <mailto:talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
>List-Help: <mailto:talk-us-request at openstreetmap.org?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us>,
>  <mailto:talk-us-request at openstreetmap.org?subject=subscribe>
>X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=S8VrxucP c=1 sm=1 
>tr=0 a=MH0xvSrAHRMakJHcG1PQUg==:117 
>a=CRRwbcOFI+X/mpt5jVcafw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 
>a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 
>a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 
>a=fDrJ_nNxAAAA:8 a=hWG5bkZXAAAA:8 
>a=595fbENkAAAA:8 a=Ngb-VIusbMmQL0VdUyYA:9 
>a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=1kxuJuLA1OUA:10 
>a=mPMPejTzh2QA:10 a=23da48SIYPIA:10 
>a=fBRctor0AAAA:8 a=JOXgU4bNLf5Q8pDvwosA:9 
>a=3nn8eI56GStAJUIN:21 a=-FEs8UIgK8oA:10 
>a=NWVoK91CQyQA:10 a=Oh4A9SA5_CyJWz607JUA:9 
>a=3CP7XzAW9HEA:10 a=KFNFQmzTeTiYwYHTjNnu:22 
>a=IXqsfEYlNX6GN9yhDIEk:22 a=hMGKPrCfFy4uRGG3eOWy:22 a=Z63lJChXQFLWIohD9yMS:22
>X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
>X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.105:25
>
>According to NPS it is a park.
>
>[1]Â 
><https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapId=e212fcb5-4ff9-4787-bbe4-3d40cc0d0daa#9/36.8412/-80.6506>https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapId=e212fcb5-4ff9-4787-bbe4-3d40cc0d0daa#9/36.8412/-80.6506
>
>You just can't trust Wikipedia. maybe they 
>should start citing OSM instead of those old pesky books.
>
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Frederik Ramm 
><<mailto:frederik at remote.org>frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Â  Â  I stumbled across the Blue Ridge Parkway in OSM (you learn something
>new every day, that's one of the things I like so much about OSM).
>
>I noticed that Wikipedia has:
>
>"The parkway, while not a National Park, has been the most visited unit
>of the National Park System every year since 1946..."
>
>but we have
>
>boundary=national_park
>delivery=no
>hgv=no
>leisure=park
>
>Is our definition of national park different than Wikipedia's, or should
>one of the two be changed?
>
>Bye
>Frederik
>
>--
>Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail 
><mailto:frederik at remote.org>frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-us mailing list
><mailto:Talk-us at openstreetmap.org>Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
>
>
>--
>@osm_seattle
><http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us>osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>_______________________________________________ 
>Talk-us mailing list Talk-us at openstreetmap.org 
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Charlotte Wolter
927 18th Street Suite A
Santa Monica, California
90403
+1-310-597-4040
techlady at techlady.com
Skype: thetechlady

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20170131/ebaeef74/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list