[Talk-us] Use without Attribution

[Brian May]

That did the trick. I never thought to try and close that. So its hidden 
by default, whereas on the weather forecast map that you see first, it 
is not. And Mapbox is prominently displayed on the lower left, so I 
figured that was the attribution.

Thanks,

Brian

On 6/12/2017 8:01 PM, joe.sapletal at charter.net wrote:
>
> If you close the All Layers window it appears in the lower right, just 
> like on the other implementations on their site.  Is this what you are 
> looking for?
>
> Joe
>
> *From: *Brian May <mailto:bmay at mapwise.com>
> *Sent: *Monday, June 12, 2017 9:38 AM
> *To: *talk-us at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
> *Cc: *hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com <mailto:hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Talk-us] Use without Attribution
>
> I used that MapBox form a couple months ago to notify missing OSM 
> attribution for the WunderMap at wunderground.com, e.g. 
> https://www.wunderground.com/wundermap?lat=27.17&lon=-80.29&radar=1
>
> Just checked and no changes. I'm pretty sure its an OSM basemap due to 
> checking features I have added that aren't on other maps.
>
> Brian
>
>  On 6/9/2017 5:50 PM, Hans De Kryger wrote:
>
>     Report it here
>     https://www.mapbox.com/blog/report-attribution-problems/
>
>
>     *Regards,*
>
>     *Hans*
>
>     On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com
>     <mailto:miketho16 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Looks like I am no longer a member of the "Talk" mailing list,
>         so I will try here:
>
>         https://mapnoco.org/results-intersection-quality
>
>         The above site uses OSM as a basemap.
>
>         Looks like the tiles come from Mapbox:
>
>         https://a.tiles.mapbox.com/v3/uis.map-561ra9g7/15/6814/12356.png
>
>         I was unable to find any attribution that credits OSM.
>
>         1) Did I miss the attribution? Is it somewhere on the page?
>
>         2) Does someone have a nicely worded template that uses all of
>         the proper terminology which I could adapt and send to the
>         site owner?
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Mike
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Talk-us mailing list
>         Talk-us at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Talk-us mailing list
>
>     Talk-us at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20170612/d53b21d1/attachment-0001.html>