[Talk-us] Drop the tiger:reviewed tag from roads

Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org
Fri May 11 17:05:13 UTC 2018


I was thinking about this some more. I do still actually use the visual cue (yellow) in JOSM to see which roads I want to double-check when editing in an area. I don't know if this is still enabled in JOSM by default but it's available as one of the default paint styles.
-- 
  Martijn van Exel
  m at rtijn.org

On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 10:59, Steve Friedl wrote:
> > I believe folks still use it in places to indicate that no-one has reviewed it on the ground, but I cannot find the thread(s) where that was brought up. 
> 
> I’m exactly one of those users: once I’ve confirmed or fixed the object, 
> I delete the tag, so this is still useful for me as a kind of to-do 
> list.
> 
> I also delete tiger:reviewed=yes tags when otherwise editing an object.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:m at rtijn.org] 
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 9:56 AM
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Drop the tiger:reviewed tag from roads
> 
> I believe folks still use it in places to indicate that no-one has 
> reviewed it on the ground, but I cannot find the thread(s) where that 
> was brought up. 
> 
> I think a mechanical removal may be a bit overzealous, even though I 
> personally wouldn't shed a tear. As long as there is at least one tag 
> left that would indicate TIGER as the original source, so we can 
> continue to detect 'unmodified TIGER' roads.
> --
>   Martijn van Exel
>   mailto:m at rtijn.org
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 10:25, Clifford Snow wrote:
> The tag, tiger:reviewed that is left over from the 2006/7 import of 
> TIGER roads has lost any meaning. For example, look at 196th Avenue 
> Southwest [1] in Thurston County WA. It's on version 6 yet still has 
> tiger:reviewed=no. Note I picked this street at random from a overpass 
> query [2]. I see this tag all the time. It's time to get rid of it. Not 
> through a mechanical edit, but by editors making changes to roads.
> 
> I'm proposing to open a ticket for JOSM to add this tag to the list of 
> discarded tags. I'd like to hear if there are any objects or think this 
> is a good idea.
> 
> I did learn from Toby Murray this morning that you can add 
> tiger:reviewed to the list of discarded tags in JOSM by going to 
> preferences->Advanced Preferences and adding tiger:reviewed to 
> tags.discardable. Then just reload JOSM for the changed to be active.
> 
> [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173554611
> [2] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yJh
> 
> Clifford
> 
> -- 
> @osm_seattle
> http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> mailto:Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> 
> 



More information about the Talk-us mailing list