[Talk-us] Review named junction nodes
Martijn van Exel
m at rtijn.org
Tue Nov 6 22:37:33 UTC 2018
I found a case where the name is definitely legitimate, so I added a warning to double check with available street level imagery, plus an example to the challenge instructions.
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33991781 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33991781>, and see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=shRl1-KeI59im7hZSmsJig&lat=40.21940429158758&lng=-79.60234247987415&z=17&x=0.6058084012090132&y=0.35483101059177824&zoom=2.2895309990765194 <https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=shRl1-KeI59im7hZSmsJig&lat=40.21940429158758&lng=-79.60234247987415&z=17&x=0.6058084012090132&y=0.35483101059177824&zoom=2.2895309990765194>
> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
> I created a MapRoulette challenge to review named junction nodes. Since named junctions are very uncommon, most of these should probably be edited. There’s only a few hundred of them so we should be able to review these together pretty quickly.
> https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3253/task/5881462 <https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3253/task/5881462>
> (I also wrote a post on how to create challenges in the new MapRoulette because some things have changed / are new: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/46863 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/46863> )
> Let me know if this makes sense to review!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us