[Talk-us] Review named junction nodes

[Martijn van Exel]

I found a case[0] where the name is definitely legitimate, so I added a warning to double check with available street level imagery, plus an example to the challenge instructions.

Martijn

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33991781 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33991781>, and see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=shRl1-KeI59im7hZSmsJig&lat=40.21940429158758&lng=-79.60234247987415&z=17&x=0.6058084012090132&y=0.35483101059177824&zoom=2.2895309990765194 <https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=shRl1-KeI59im7hZSmsJig&lat=40.21940429158758&lng=-79.60234247987415&z=17&x=0.6058084012090132&y=0.35483101059177824&zoom=2.2895309990765194> 

> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I created a MapRoulette challenge to review named junction nodes. Since named junctions are very uncommon, most of these should probably be edited. There’s only a few hundred of them so we should be able to review these together pretty quickly.
> 
> https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3253/task/5881462 <https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3253/task/5881462> 
> 
> (I also wrote a post on how to create challenges in the new MapRoulette because some things have changed / are new: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/46863 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/46863> )
> 
> Let me know if this makes sense to review!
> 
> Martijn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20181106/e2b634f7/attachment.html>